Case: Plaza v. N.Y. Health and Hospitals Corp.
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York
Date: 7/17/12
From: New York attorney Gary E. Rosenberg (personal injury and accident attorney and lawyer; serving Brooklyn and Queens; Queens injury attorney)
**************************************************
RELATED POSTS:
JURY ABSOLVES DEFENDANT DOCTORS OF CLAIMED MEDICAL MALPRACTICE IN CHILD'S BIRTH
**************************************************
Facts: This unfortunate decision throws out a medical malpractice case brought by a child due to the technical defect of late service of a notice of claim paper. The child allegedly suffers from seizures and developmental delays due to problems during birth.
Plaintiff sued N.Y.C. Health & Hospitals Corp. but didn't serve it with a notice of claim form within 90 days of the medical malpractice complained of but, rather, more than two years late.
In 2009 the defense moved to dismiss and plaintiff cross-moved to force acceptance of the late-served notice of claim.
Held: Plaintiff failed to give a reasonable excuse for the delay. Also, plaintiff failed to show that HHC had "actual notice" of the claim when it arose -- hospital records weren't enough here because the baby appeared to be born healthy, so the HHC had no clue that there was anything wrong. Case dismissed.
Dissent: One judge disagreed. She believes that the hospital records gave sufficient "actual notice" to HHC so that the late notice of claim should have been accepted.