Court: Supreme Court, Dutchess County, New York
Case: Mayen v. Tigges, M.D. and DePuy Orthopedic
Date: Aug. 17, 2012
From: New York attorney Gary E. Rosenberg
**************************************************
RELATED POSTS:
COURT UPHOLDS JURY VERDICT DISMISSING INJURY CLAIM FOR DEFECTIVE STOVE
ACCIDENT VICTIM'S PERSONAL INJURY BURN CASE ALLOWED TO PROCEED; SHE CLAIMS THAT BACARDI "151" RUM IS A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT
**************************************************
Facts:
Products liability case for injury due to
defective knee replacement manufactured by Depuy.
Plaintiff’s knee was replaced by DePuy’s mechanical knee.
Depuy has made a motion to dismiss the complaint based on federal preemption of the claims against it as a medical device manufacturer.
Holding: Since this knee replacement had the approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, under the U.S. Supreme Court case of Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), Federal law preempts plaintiff’s state law claims. She can’t sue and her claim is dismissed.
Comment: The plaintiff tried to get around this motion by arguing that she need to conduct pre-trial discovery proceedings of the defendant. The Court is not fooled, and points out that she hasn’t said what any such discovery might prove and how anything she might find could beat the Federal preemption of this claim. She can’t.