Brooklyn Personal Injury Attorney
Auto Accidents in Brooklyn Firm Overview Attorney Profile Newsletters Frequently Asked Personal Injury and Auto Accident Questions Blog Contact
Auto Accident * Car Accident
Bicycle Accidents
Black Car Accidents
Bus Accidents
Cab Accidents
Car Rollover
Car Service Accidents
Construction Accidents
Defective Products
Drunk Driving * Drugged Driving
Electric Shock * Electrocution
Elevator Accidents
Escalator Accidents
Limousine Accidents
Livery Accidents
Medical Malpractice
Motorcycle Accidents
Sidewalk Accidents
Slip / Trip and Fall Accidents
Taxi Accidents
Toxic Torts
Workplace Accidents
Amputation Injuries
Back Injuries
Birth Injuries
Brain Injury * Brain Damage
Broken Bones
Burn Injuries
Child Lead Poisoning
Crush Injury to Body
Death * Wrongful Death
Dismemberment
Eye Injuries
Fracture Injuries
Head Injuries
Hearing Loss (Deafness)
Herniated Discs
Internal Injuries
Knee Injuries
Loss of Limb
Neck Injuries
Nerve Damage
Radiculopathy
Shoulder Injuries
Spinal Cord Injuries
TMJ Disorder * Jaw Disorder
Whiplash Injury
Areas of Practice
How Does My New York Accident Or Injury Lawyer Get Paid?
Click here to be instantly connected to my office. Click here to read my blog. Contact my office right away! Click here to view my past case results.

Past Cases & Results


Gene Ann Criscenti, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Verizon, et al., Defendants, Channell Commercial Corp., Defendant-Respondent.
2285N

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
ENTERED: APRIL 8, 2010

Gary E. Rosenberg, P.C., Forest Hills (Gary E. Rosenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Ahmuty, Demers & McManus, Albertson (Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for respondent.

Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, McGuire, Acosta, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

_________________________

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered November 13, 2009, which granted defendant-respondent's motion to allow its deposition to be conducted in California by video conference, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the motion denied.

Respondent, a publicly traded corporation, with over 600 employees, has failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that appearing in New York City for deposition would cause it substantial hardship (see Fortress Credit Opportunities I LP v Netschi, 59 AD3d 250 [2009]; Kenney, Becker, LLP v. Kenney, 34 AD3d 351 [2006]; Swiss Bank Corp. v. Geccee Exportaciones, 260 A.D.2d 254 [1999] ). Respondent merely asserts, without more, that its chief executive officer, who respondent acknowledges travels throughout the world almost six months out of the year, will be unable to be deposed in New York. Nor has respondent proffered any reason why none of its other 600 plus employees are appropriate witnesses.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

_______________________

CLERK

N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.,2010.
Criscenti v. Verizon
--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2010 WL 1372698 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.), 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 02858

 

Law Offices of Gary E. Rosenberg, P.C.

109-01 72nd Road, Suite 1A
Forest Hills, New York 11375

(718) 520-8787

26 Court Street, Suite 404
Brooklyn, New York 11242

Serving: New York City, including the Boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, Staten Island, and Bronx, and the Counties of Kings, Richmond, Queens, New York, Bronx, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland and Dutchess.




Attorney Web Design This website does not give legal advice; reading it does not make me your lawyer.

Address: 109-01 72nd Road, Suite 1A, Forest Hills, New York 11375 - - Phone: (718) 520-8787