Brooklyn Personal Injury Attorney
Auto Accidents in Brooklyn Firm Overview Attorney Profile Newsletters Frequently Asked Personal Injury and Auto Accident Questions Blog Contact
Areas of Practice
How Does My New York Accident Or Injury Lawyer Get Paid?
Auto Accidents
Bicycle Accidents
Black Car Accidents
Bus Accidents
Cab Accidents
Car Service Accidents
Construction Accidents
Defective Products
Drunk Driving * Drugged Driving
Elevator Accidents
Escalator Accidents
Limousine Accidents
Livery Accidents
Medical Malpractice
Sidewalk Accidents
Slip / Trip and Fall Accidents
Taxi Accidents
Toxic Torts
Workplace Accidents
Amputation Injuries
Back Injuries
Birth Injuries
Broken Bones
Burn Injuries
Child Lead Poisoning
Crush Injury to Body
Dismemberment
Eye Injuries
Fracture Injuries
Head Injuries
Herniated Discs
Internal Injuries
Loss of Limb
Neck Injuries
Nerve Damage
Radiculopathy
Spinal Cord Injuries
TMJ Disorder * Jaw Disorder
Whiplash Injury
Contact Us




Click here to be instantly connected to my office. Click here to read my blog. Contact my office right away! Click here to view my past case results.

Past Cases & Results

Mickele Castelli, Also Known as Michael Castelli, Respondent,
v.
KDI, Atlantic Foods, Inc., et al., Respondents‑Appellants, and Shelter Security
Systems, Ltd., Defendant and Third‑Party Plaintiff‑Appellant‑Respondent, et
al., Defendants. Watchdog Security Systems, Inc., Third‑Party Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York

(March 19, 2001)

In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third‑party plaintiff Shelter Security Systems, Ltd., appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated December 19, 1999, which, inter alia, granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action and denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of contractual indemnification against the defendant Kolpen Distributors, Inc., and the defendants KDI, Atlantic Foods, Inc., Kolpen Distributors, Inc., and Jack Glazer cross‑appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action and denied that branch of their cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross‑appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondent.

The plaintiff, Mickele Castelli, a/k/a Michael Castelli, was injured when he fell from a ladder that swayed and rocked and lacked safety feet or any type of anchor. At the time of the accident, the plaintiff, who was employed by the third‑party defendant Watchdog Security Systems, Inc., was installing a new alarm system and motion detectors to replace an existing system. Following the accident, the plaintiff commenced this action against, among others, the defendant Jack Glazer, the receiver of the premises where the accident occurred, and the defendants KDI, Atlantic Foods, Inc., and Kolpen Distributors, Inc., the lessees of the premises, alleging, inter alia, that these defendants had violated Labor Law § 240 (1) by failing to furnish him with a ladder that was designed to give proper protection.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. The plaintiff established that the work that he was performing at the time of his accident constituted an alteration to a structure within the purview of the statute (see, Walsh v Applied Digital Data Sys., 190 AD2d 731; Atwell v Mountain, Ltd., 184 AD2d 1065; Tate v Clancy‑Cullen Stor. Co., 171 AD2d 292), that he was not provided with appropriate safety devices, and that this violation was a proximate cause of his injuries (see, Bland v Manocherian, 66 NY2d 452; Sprague v Peckham Materials Corp., 240 AD2d 392).

There is no merit to the contention of Shelter Securities Systems, Ltd.  (hereinafter Shelter) that the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of contractual indemnification against Kolpen Distributors, Inc. (hereinafter Kolpen). Although the installation and maintenance agreement between Shelter and Kolpen contained an indemnification clause, that provision, read in its entirety, was clearly intended only to relieve Shelter from liability arising from the failure of its alarm system, or the failure to perform its obligations under the agreement. The plaintiff's injury, which is unrelated to the operation of the alarm system, is beyond the scope of the indemnification clause (see, Zgoba v Easy Shopping Corp., 246 AD2d 539).

The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.

Bracken, P. J., Santucci, S. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Copyright (c) 2004, Randy A. Daniels, Secretary of State, State of New York.
N.Y.A.D.,2001.

Law Offices of Gary E. Rosenberg, P.C.

109-01 72nd Road, Suite 1A
Forest Hills, New York 11375

(718) 520-8787

26 Court Street, Suite 404
Brooklyn, New York 11242

Serving: New York City, including the Boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, Manhattan, Staten Island, and Bronx, and the Counties of Kings, Richmond, Queens, New York, Bronx, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland and Dutchess.

Attorney Web Design The information on this New York Personal Injury Attorney & Lawyers / Law Firm website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Address: 109-01 72nd Road, Suite 1A, Forest Hills, New York 11375    Phone: (718) 520-8787
Administration